Home News Models Alternatives
 
Smart Car of America - America's Largest Smart Fortwo Enthusiast Community   Smart Fortwo, smart car, smartcar
HOME FORUMS GALLERY

Go Back   Smart Car of America Forums > Smart Car Technical > Smart Car Fuel Economy

Notices

» Supporting Partner
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-29-2009, 05:29 PM   #11 (permalink)
Gobble Gobble
SCOA Club
 
forestacademy's Avatar
 
Location: South Central WI
Drive: Versa - the smarts my wife
My SCOA Gallery
Thanks guys.

In gear, foot off gas turns off the gas better than putting it in N.

Good to Know. Now the only question left is while sitting at a stop light, is it better to keep it in gear with foot on brake hard enough to disengage creep, or pop it into N with a light brake? I prefer N because my foot gets tired pushing on the brake.

forestacademy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2009, 05:55 PM   #12 (permalink)
 
Location: New Orleans
Quote:
Originally Posted by forestacademy View Post
Thanks guys.

In gear, foot off gas turns off the gas better than putting it in N.

Good to Know. Now the only question left is while sitting at a stop light, is it better to keep it in gear with foot on brake hard enough to disengage creep, or pop it into N with a light brake? I prefer N because my foot gets tired pushing on the brake.

Sounds about right.. I too like to use N while stopped..
And I coast in N quite a bit...

I do belive the readings that people are reporting here from the Scan Guage (and I do not have one)... but ... I have read the scan guage setup instructions.. and there is a setting IN THE GAUGE that assumes fuel cutoff below a user defineanble throttle postition point.
So.. the readings of 0 gallons per hour.. are really the SG assuming that the fuel is cut off... no where have I seen a definitive answer as to whether or not the Smart does cut the fuel.. (guess I could hook a scope up to the injectors to find out)...

I do coast.. I have a tall overpass just after I leave work.. followed by a stop light 3 blocks away.. I switch to N at the top of the overpass.. and if the light is red.. I coast to it without loosing enough speed to be going much slower than ordinary traffic.. if the light is green I simply apply a little throttle and drop back to D.. the smart figures out the gear perfectly.

Louis

tvengineer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2009, 06:15 PM   #13 (permalink)
SCOA Club
 
John_H's Avatar
 
Location: Orlando, FL
Drive: Merlot Red Cabriolet
My SCOA Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCC1701 View Post
John, I haven't checked to compare the two conditions yet (coasting in N v.s. in gear) but, the SGII can show GPH.
From a given speed, 0gph (in gear, no gas) will give you 0.0x miles of travel before you come to a stop. From that same speed, the 0.44gph will allow you to travel 0.0y miles (y>x) before coming to a stop. The difference in distance (miles) and the fuel used in neutral (gallons) will give you a miles per gallon rating that just isn't calculated in a scanguage.

I'd suggest that the braking will exert a much larger effective use of fuel than the idling in neutral.

John_H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2009, 06:25 PM   #14 (permalink)
 
Location: New Orleans
Not arguing about it.. I suspect it's like a bunch of other things... comes down to personal opinion. The Scan Gage just isn't going to give us the answer to this one.

I just drive the smart much like I did my old Miata... I would put the clutch in and coast to a stoplight or down an overpass..
Smart has no clutch.. so i bump it to N. If I am coming down a hill and need the engine braking.. I certainly would stay in gear.

Quote:
Originally Posted by John_H View Post
From a given speed, 0gph (in gear, no gas) will give you 0.0x miles of travel before you come to a stop. From that same speed, the 0.44gph will allow you to travel 0.0y miles (y>x) before coming to a stop. The difference in distance (miles) and the fuel used in neutral (gallons) will give you a miles per gallon rating that just isn't calculated in a scanguage.

I'd suggest that the braking will exert a much larger effective use of fuel than the idling in neutral.

tvengineer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2009, 07:24 PM   #15 (permalink)
?*?*?
SCOA Club
 
NCC1701's Avatar
 
Location: Panama City, Florida
Drive: 2008 smart cabriolet
My SCOA Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by forestacademy View Post
Now the only question left is while sitting at a stop light, is it better to keep it in gear with foot on brake hard enough to disengage creep, or pop it into N with a light brake? I prefer N because my foot gets tired pushing on the brake.
According to SGII: I checked this evening. There appears to be no difference in GPH between stopped in N and stopped in gear. With the A/C turned off, I got 0.30 to 0.31 either way.

BTW, my earlier report of 0.44 GPH coasting in N was with the A/C on. Without A/C, it probably would've been 0.30.

NCC1701 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2009, 07:28 PM   #16 (permalink)
?*?*?
SCOA Club
 
NCC1701's Avatar
 
Location: Panama City, Florida
Drive: 2008 smart cabriolet
My SCOA Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by John_H View Post
From a given speed, 0gph (in gear, no gas) will give you 0.0x miles of travel before you come to a stop. From that same speed, the 0.44gph will allow you to travel 0.0y miles (y>x) before coming to a stop. The difference in distance (miles) and the fuel used in neutral (gallons) will give you a miles per gallon rating that just isn't calculated in a scanguage.
OK, so the question goes unanswered, if I understand correctly. Could be a Calculus problem with more data available. (Just a wee bit rusty in that department).

NCC1701 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2009, 07:42 PM   #17 (permalink)
SCOA Club
 
John_H's Avatar
 
Location: Orlando, FL
Drive: Merlot Red Cabriolet
My SCOA Gallery
I'd love "real" data on fuel consumption versus horsepower at the wheels across the RPM range as well as typical drag forces across the speed range. That could produce some real information on ideal hypermiling techniques as well as best gear selection at various inclines.

It's not a problem, it's an exercise.

John_H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2009, 11:46 AM   #18 (permalink)
 
Dave777's Avatar
 
Location: Pacific Northwest
Drive: 2008 smart Passion
I believe the ScanGauge is reading correctly when coasting in gear...0.0 GPH. In my Toyota Echo the same gauge read a measurable amount, as the Echo engine did not have injector cutoff.

It doesn't really matter much. Fill your tank with 9 or 10 gallons, drive conservatively and enjoy.

(Still waiting for someone to exceed the 505 miles I did on one tank. )

Dave777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2009, 12:30 PM   #19 (permalink)
To the XCAPEPOD!
SCOA Club
 
rfernatt's Avatar
 
Location: Almost Heaven... West Virginia
Drive: smart fortwo
My SCOA Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by tvengineer View Post
I have read the scan guage setup instructions.. and there is a setting IN THE GAUGE that assumes fuel cutoff below a user defineanble throttle postition point.
So.. the readings of 0 gallons per hour.. are really the SG assuming that the fuel is cut off... no where have I seen a definitive answer as to whether or not the Smart does cut the fuel.. (guess I could hook a scope up to the injectors to find out)...
If you're coasting in N with your foot off the gas or coasting in gear with your foot off the gas (assuming no difference in load due to A/C, etc), the throttle position should be the same (even if it's not 0), correct?

So, if a SG reports minor fuel usage in N, but not in D under these conditions, I would say that the fuel is actually cutoff since everything else is equal. My 2008 Nissan truck with automatic also reports no fuel usage while coasting in D, but some usage while in N.


rfernatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2009, 12:41 PM   #20 (permalink)
SCOA Club
 
craven3557's Avatar
 
Location: Melissa,TX
Drive: Smart Cab,Explorer,Protege
My SCOA Gallery
Ow You guys make my head hurt or maybe it's just tired head.:] Does really make a big difference if you get 36 mpg or 36.2?

craven3557 is offline   Reply With Quote
Today
 


This ad will not be shown if you are logged in.

Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pulse and Glide (Hypermiling trick) unicycle Smart Car General Discussion 57 10-21-2008 07:27 PM
The other side of hypermiling jwight The Car Lounge 19 07-19-2008 07:20 AM
Scanguage II leroyn60 Interior & Exterior 8 07-13-2008 12:19 PM
HYPERMILING Video. SmartBob Smart Car Operation and Maintenance 13 05-24-2008 10:52 AM
Hypermiling the smart: 60 to 100mpg? Perscitus Smart Car General Discussion 7 11-09-2007 07:56 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:51 PM.


Smart Cars of America, LLC is not affiliated with, authorized by, associated with or have any connection with G&K, Zap, Mercedes-Benz, Mercedes-Benz AMG, Mercedes-Benz McLaren Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, smart Canada Division, DaimlerChrysler, Chrysler LLC, DaimlerChrysler AG, Maybach, smart gmbh, a division of Mercedes Benz LLC, the manufacturer of SMART automobiles, smart USA Distributor, LLC, a division of Penske Automotive Group, Inc, the exclusive authorized U.S. importer and distributor of the smart vehicle or any of their official dealerships


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Ad Management by RedTyger