Quote:
Originally Posted by nader
Please feel free to get technical. I assume that you see a flaw in their design? Why will yours be better?
|
There's a few technical deficiencies.
#1. The way the accelerator plugs into the device. It does not use proper contacts but instead plugs directly into routed out tabs on the circuit board. We understand why they did this, and in fact this is how our prototype works, but its not electrically sound. Vibrations and flex can and will result in sporadic contact failure without proper support on all 3 axis/planes. According to photos and their instructions and their largest Canadian reseller, the only thing holding it on is a nylon zap strap, and that only takes care of one axis. That retailer (I'd say their name but I'm not sure if that's allowed here) confirmed to us that a significant number of customers have complained about periodic or sporadic "dead pedal" and that's what we believe is the cause. Other than for our in-house prototype (and only because we couldn't get the proper connectors in time) we will not be using this method. Secure and supported connectors are also required by both the DOT and Transport Canada regulations and there's a good reason for it. Beyond electrical failure, it also introduces a (very slight) fire risk.
I'm not here to slam the competition. But it wouldn't have occurred to us to make a product if there was already a suitable one on the market.
Other differences are discussed on our R&D website but I don't think I'm allowed to post that URL here any more. I hope I've answered your question.