Quote:
Originally Posted by Car-man
Shaking head...
Meet, sorry, I like ya, but when someone says something to me that's pure nonsense, I got to respond...
|
Then I'm curious as to why you responded to the post I wrote. I'm more curious, however, as to why you didn't respond to the the post you made that I'm responding to here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Car-man
The Smart 4two and the LiV Dash are both special interest cars. They arn't even sold in main brand showrooms.
|
Ah. I'm sure that the Smart marquee dealerships will be glad to know that they're not a main brand showroom. That will greatly reduce the amount of money that they're paying for those Smart dealership showrooms. The ones where the Smart cars are the only car sold.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Car-man
They're sold along side other such cars; such as the Zip car and EV bicycles at special interest dealers.
|
I've been to three Smart dealerships, and have never ever seen a Zip or any other such car there. Not even on a trade.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Car-man
Even if they are sold at a dedicated Smart Car dealer, its still a special interest dealer.
|
Err... You said that Smarts aren't sold at Smart dealerships, and you you're saying that they are sold at Smart dealerships. Pardon me if I find that somewhat confusing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Car-man
And a soon to go out of business dealer at that; lack of diversity result in lack of customers.
|
That definitely explains the 12-14 month waiting lists to get the cars, the immediate purchase of any orphan that shows up on the lot, the insane markup of used Smarts at other dealerships and the high prices fetched by owners who sell their cars on ebay or autotrader.
Dealerships would kill to have a product like that to go out of business with.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Car-man
As for the Tesla Roadster, its not an after market Lotus Elise. Lotus and Tesla co-designed it, thus the resemblance to the Elise, but the two cars share about 8% of their parts.
|
That's a fallacy, and a silly bit of nonsense put out by Tesla. Maybe by number of parts it works out to 8%, but the reality is that the chassis is Lotus, the subframe is UK Lotus, the suspension is Lotus (with different shocks), the interior is Lotus, the roll cage is Lotus, the electrical system is Lotus, the wheels are Lotus, and so on. Tesla may want to say that it shares a minimal amount of "parts" ... but when those "parts" amount to entire systems that make up 90% of the car, well the math is a bit skewed.
The Tesla is an aftermarket Lotus Elise, pure and simple.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Car-man
A Ford Mustang shares more than that with the F-150.
|
Not really. A Ford Mustang has it's own chassis, drivetrain, suspension, interior, body, and pretty much everything else.
Having owned a Lotus Elise and having now driven a Tesla, the differences between the two cars is a drivetrain and some bodywork. That's it.
Your pal,
Meat.