Home News Models Alternatives AfterMarket
 
Smart Car of America - America's Largest Smart Fortwo Enthusiast Community   Smart Fortwo, smart car, smartcar
HOME FORUMS GALLERY CLUBS

Go Back   Smart Car of America Forums > Life Beyond Smart > Off-Topic Cafe

Notices

» Supporting Partner
» Recent Threads
Music Game
2,458 Replies
Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-03-2008, 07:40 AM   #21 (permalink)
 
JanetMermaid's Avatar
 
Location: Lockhart, TX
Drive: Mercedes SL 500
My SCOA Gallery
It is always important to stand in integrity. What ultimately defines who we are to ourselves and who others know us to be is our word. Do the right thing and own up.
JanetMermaid is offline  
Today
 


This ad will not be shown if you are logged in.

Old 07-03-2008, 07:56 AM   #22 (permalink)
 
Smart Enuf's Avatar
 
Location: Elk Grove, CA
Drive: 2008 smart fortwo cabrio
My SCOA Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by rawlus® View Post
perhaps i don't understand, if the limit is 50% and you only have 35% then what's the issue?

the state will have to make it's case that you exceed the limit. this is done by presenting evidence. if what you say is true, then the charge cannot be proven.
Sounds like a minimum (not maximum) requirement that 50% of light be transmitted through the glass, and his tinted windows only transmit 35% (at least, that's what the tint manufacturer rates it at).
Smart Enuf is offline  
Old 07-03-2008, 08:01 AM   #23 (permalink)
SCOA Club
 
theguywiththelongestname's Avatar
 
Location: Mojave Desert, CA
Drive: 08 smart, 01 jeep cherokee
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smart Enuf View Post
Sounds like a minimum (not maximum) requirement that 50% of light be transmitted through the glass, and his tinted windows only transmit 35% (at least, that's what the tint manufacturer rates it at).
that's the way i read it too: minimum of 50% light transmission...

this post did lead me to check out the code here in california: for side windows, it's 88% light transmission!

Last edited by theguywiththelongestname; 07-03-2008 at 08:19 AM.
theguywiththelongestname is offline  
Old 07-03-2008, 08:02 AM   #24 (permalink)
zeitgeist
SCOA Club
 
Location: Milford, MA
oh. in that case a 65% tint seems excessive.
rawlus® is online now  
Old 07-03-2008, 08:18 AM   #25 (permalink)
 
Smart Enuf's Avatar
 
Location: Elk Grove, CA
Drive: 2008 smart fortwo cabrio
My SCOA Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by theguywiththelongestname View Post
that's the way i read it too: minimum of 50% light transmission...

this post did lead me to check out the code here in california: for side windows, it's 88% light tansmission!
Yeah, have a friend who got ticketed AND the officer made her scrape off the tint on the spot with a razor. She said she had it very lightly tinted and the installer assured her it complied with the law, but it apparently was still too dark.
Smart Enuf is offline  
Old 07-03-2008, 08:22 AM   #26 (permalink)
 
astuto's Avatar
 
Location: Virginia Beach
Drive: "little red" pure
My SCOA Gallery
Virginia Law:
C. Except as provided in § 46.2-1053, but notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this section, no sun-shading or tinting film may be applied or affixed to any window of a motor vehicle unless such motor vehicle is equipped with a mirror on each side of such motor vehicle, so located as to reflect to the driver of the vehicle a view of the highway for at least 200 feet to the rear of such vehicle, and the sun-shading or tinting film is applied or affixed in accordance with the following:
  • 1. No sun-shading or tinting films may be applied or affixed to the rear side windows or rear window or windows of any motor vehicle operated on the highways of this Commonwealth that reduces the total light transmittance of such window to less than thirty-five percent;
    2. No sun-shading or tinting films may be applied or affixed to the front side windows of any motor vehicle operated on the highways of this Commonwealth that reduces total light transmittance of such window to less than fifty percent;
    3. No sun-shading or tinting films shall be applied or affixed to any window of a motor vehicle that has a reflectance of light exceeding twenty percent;
    4. Any person who operates a motor vehicle on the highways of this Commonwealth with sun-shading or tinting films that has a total light transmittance less than that required by subdivisions 1 and 2 of this subsection or a reflectance of light exceeding twenty percent shall be guilty of a traffic infraction but shall not be awarded any demerit points by the Commissioner for the violation;
    5. Any person or firm who applies or affixes to the windows of any motor vehicle in Virginia sun-shading or tinting films that reduce the light transmittance to levels less than that allowed in subdivisions 1 and 2 of this subsection or that have a reflectance of light exceeding twenty percent shall be guilty of a Class 3 misdemeanor for the first offense and of a Class 2 misdemeanor for any subsequent offense;
D. The Division of Purchases and Supply, pursuant to § 2.1-446, shall determine the proper standards for equipment or devices used to measure light transmittance through windows of motor vehicles. Law-enforcement officers shall use only such equipment or devices to measure light transmittance through windows that meet the standards established by the Division. Such measurements made by law-enforcement officers shall be given a tolerance of minus seven percentage points.
E. No film or darkening material may be applied on the windshield except to replace the sunshield in the uppermost area as installed by the manufacturer of the vehicle.
F. Nothing in this section shall prohibit the affixing to the rear window of a motor vehicle of a single sticker no larger than twenty square inches if such sticker is totally contained within the lower five inches of the glass of the rear window, nor shall subsection B of this section apply to a motor vehicle to which but one such sticker is so affixed.
G. Nothing in this section shall prohibit applying to the rear side windows or rear window of any multi-purpose passenger vehicle or pickup truck sun-shading or tinting films that reduce the total light transmittance of such window or windows below thirty-five percent.
H. As used in this article: "front side windows" means those windows located adjacent to and forward of the driver's seat; "rear side windows" means those windows located to the rear of the driver's seat; "rear window" or "rear windows" means those windows which are located to the rear of the passenger compartment of a motor vehicle and which are approximately parallel to the windshield; "multi-purpose passenger vehicle" means any motor vehicle that is (i) designed to carry no more than ten persons and (ii) constructed either on a truck chassis or with special features for occasional off-road use.
I. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this section, sun-shading material which was applied or installed prior to July 1, 1987, in a manner and on which windows not then in violation of Virginia law, shall continue to be lawful, provided that it can be shown by appropriate receipts that such material was installed prior to July 1, 1987.
J. Where a person is convicted within one year of a second or subsequent violation of this section involving the operation of the same vehicle having a tinted or smoked windshield, the court, in addition to any other penalty, may order the person so convicted to remove such tinted or smoked windshield from the vehicle.
K. The provisions of this section shall not apply to law-enforcement vehicles.
L. The provisions of Subdivision C 1 of this section shall not apply to sight-seeing carriers as defined in \047 46.2-2200 and limousine and executive sedan carriers as deined in \047 46.2-2500
astuto is offline  
Old 07-03-2008, 08:23 AM   #27 (permalink)
 
Orphan-Beggar's Avatar
 
Location: Newark, Delaware
Drive: 2009 Red/blk Passion Coupe
My SCOA Gallery
When traveling state to state, which tint laws apply?
Orphan-Beggar is offline  
Old 07-03-2008, 08:26 AM   #28 (permalink)
Modérateur
SCOA Club
 
JPaul's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Drive: w/s/r 08 passion
My SCOA Gallery
In Va., i.e. "any motor vehicle operated on the highways of this Commonwealth"...
JPaul is offline  
Old 07-03-2008, 08:32 AM   #29 (permalink)
SCOA Club
 
helidrvr's Avatar
 
Location: Carol Stream, IL
Drive: 05 Galant, 08 Y/S Cabrio
Quote:
Originally Posted by JanetMermaid View Post
It is always important to stand in integrity. What ultimately defines who we are to ourselves and who others know us to be is our word. Do the right thing and own up.
True enough, dear Lady.

On the other hand, it is useful to remember always this fundamental truth:

Every single "law" is nothing but a political opinion enforced by (the threat of) violence.

Before adhering to any law, it therefore behooves us to strip away the violence and determine if the opinion expressed in that law is ethically supportable. The easiest way to do this is to ask but one simple question:

Would I, with gun in hand, "enforce" this opinion on my neighbor?

If the answer to this question is "NO", then the only "right thing" is to resist that law with every available resource one can muster or failing that, to at the very least protest it vigorously.
helidrvr is offline  
Old 07-03-2008, 08:48 AM   #30 (permalink)
Moderator
SCOA Club
 
jwight's Avatar
 
Location: Kettering, OH ETA 25 Jan 09
Drive: 08 Blue/Silver Passion
My SCOA Gallery
So, if you wouldn't use a gun to keep someone from doing 60 in a 25 mph school zone that's a "bad" law? I ain't buying it, with all due respect.

There's a reason for the tint laws/regulations - to ensure enough visibility out of the car (and into it for the LEOs out there) to keep the drivers from running into things they can't see, and to let others see into the car for a variety of reasons, not the least of which was mentioned by whalepirot earlier - need to be able to make eye contact with the driver and to see through the car at what's coming from behind it.
jwight is online now  
Today
 


This ad will not be shown if you are logged in.

Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Tags
ticket, window tint

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Would I get a ticket for parking like this? SMART Smart Car Gallery 25 10-05-2008 02:34 PM
nearly got a ticket for perpendicular parking curtis Smart Car General Discussion 1 06-08-2008 10:57 PM
OUCH! I got a speeding ticket! dw103 The Car Lounge 67 04-28-2008 12:04 PM
ZAP Awaits Court Decision on California Jurisdiction for Smart Car Lawsuit SmartShanna Smart Car News & Rumors 28 11-24-2007 11:33 AM
I've got a golden ticket... 2smart4u Smart Car General Discussion 14 10-25-2007 06:34 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:49 AM.


Smart Cars of America, LLC is not affiliated with, authorized by, associated with or have any connection with G&K, Zap, Mercedes-Benz, Mercedes-Benz AMG, Mercedes-Benz McLaren Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, smart Canada Division, DaimlerChrysler, Chrysler LLC, DaimlerChrysler AG, Maybach, smart gmbh, a division of Mercedes Benz LLC, the manufacturer of SMART automobiles, smart USA Distributor, LLC, a division of Penske Automotive Group, Inc, the exclusive authorized U.S. importer and distributor of the smart vehicle or any of their official dealerships


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Ad Management by RedTyger