Quote:
Originally Posted by John_H
...fortow:
You say "They need to stop thinking that this is a small luxury car and get back to decent basics" then counter "It should just 'feel' right and perform 'right'." If they try to make the manual work like an automatic, it's deviating more and more from "decent basics," increasing complexity, hence reducing reliability.
|
I was not inconsistent in those comments. They relate to the marketing attempt to make people believe it had an automatic transmission. I even had to correct a service writer's mistaken impression that the transmission was an automatic.
There are many small and inexpensive cars that do have good performing auto transmissions - and they are not luxury cars. Feeling right, and performing right have nothing to do with luxury.
Also, I am not suggesting that they try to make the manual work like an automatic. That's where they have gone wrong now. Small cars do have good automatics. The space limitations in the smart may preclude using a standard type auto transmission, but may not as well. This particular single single clutch automated manual with the programming it has just does not work very well. There are automated manuals that do work well. Of course they are more costly but smart does not have to use them. There are also other options.
By the way, increasing complexity does not have to equate with reducing reliability.