does anyone out there drive a F430 ferrari, the one with the optional F1 transmission?
can some of you webby gearheads glean some info on the 430 ferrari f1 transmission, and see how its functionality compares with that of our 451 smarties?
i have an f430 and a 451, and with respect to their transmissions and shifting, it seems like the two vehicles are quite similar in concept and practise.
neither is a true automatic or conventional manual. i'm quite certain the ferrari is a hydraulically assisted electro-mechanically shifted transmission. i suspect the 451 uses an electro-mechanically assisted trans as well. (excuse me if my terminology is off a wee bit)
i'd swear the two cars are related.
when i put my smartie into paddle-mode, i can get a bit more 'performance' out of it in that i can wind it up to slip onto the highway, but when i put it in auto-mode i get an enjoyably leisurely ride about town.
i can say the exact same thing about my 430. when i put the ferrari in auto-mode its a total slug, with the exact same kinda of bobbing lag between shifts as the smartie. obviously in paddle-shifting mode the 430 can be quite peppy, quite like my smartie!
in paddle-mode the 430 will lag the least bit between gearshifts if you just brainlessly lay your foot on the gas (like the manual says to...), but if you time the slightest drop in revs just at the time you shift... it seems to smooth it out into a delighfully graceful transition of power.
i have noticed the same effect in my smartie, to a lesser extent. (mainly the missing onslaught of the unending revs.) if you just power on through your smartie gear changes with your foot mashing the pedal, you'll get a bob-lag, just like in a ferrari. feather the gas with finesse, and your smartie will sing.
also the 430 has an adjustable shift-time that can be changed with a dial on the steering wheel. the range is something like 150 milliseconds down to about 60 milliseconds, and believe it or not this minor difference is quite noticable.
it seems that folks who keep their shiftimes down to 60ms also have a clutch change at 10k miles. (but they tend to hammer the car alot too.) perhaps the longer shift time of the smart is intended to help increase longevity of the system...? perhaps to keep costs down too..?
smart designers probably thought that formula1-racing-style shift times found on the ferrari were not needed on the smart... i agree. i'm not sure theyre even needed on a ferrari.
whether paddleshifting or in 'D', i find feathering the gas at shift time greatly reduces the bobbing-effect, but in both cars it took a while to learn how to do this with finesse.
i think that people just assume this 'learning curve' is just part of driving a high hp exotic,
so in the case of the ferrari, this 'exotic transmission and shifting technique' is viewed as 'cool and desirable'...
but in the case of the smartie, the exact same characteristics are being viewed by some as detractor...?