I find this all interesting, and had forgotten all the variations. Is the choice of going with 36 vs. 48 vs. 60 months just about getting the monthly payment you end up with lower or are there other reasons people choose one over another?
I would have thought the shorter term loan the better, in terms of total interest paid, but of course keeping within the monthly amount that you are budgeting for the payment.
Also the decision to finance 100% vs. 70 - 80%. I can use part of my down payment to pay off another higher interest loan, for instance, and finance a larger % of the total cost of the smart. That seems to make sense right now.
- in a city where even large investment banks are going down fast, I'm not the most financially savvy of individuals... the last time I bought a new car, I traded in another car for the "down payment" and financed through the Renault dealer at 48 months. That seemed to work out OK, but that was 20 years ago ;-)