I don't know when the LA Times video was made, but the information it contains is quite old. Dan Neil's original review of the smart appeared in the LA Times in May, and was reworked for the SF Chronicle in June.
That piece ended with the exact same list of "facts" as the video, including the unconfirmed pricing, 0-60 time and slightly misquoted horsepower. It also cited identical gas mileage numbers, but without labeling them as "EPA estimates".
I suspect the last frame of the video was simply copied from this article, and the EPA label was added by someone who misunderstood the actual origin of the information.