Quote:
Originally Posted by pastalorenzo
got mine in pburg-lots of them upstairs,8 I think plus a demo. This really is not a shocker and with people seeing more and more of them on the road they start to lose the stare factor.
|
That's good. When I get one, I don't need people bugging me. I wish more people would buy them.
I keep thinking about buying a Yaris, Kia Rio, Hyundai Accent or Mini Cooper... but then all I have to do is see articles about the crash tests and how the smart fortwo is the cheapest to repair out of all of the vehicles.
I know tons of articles and people all over the place rag on the smart car. 80% of the people I talk to in person that I tell them I am going to buy a smart car all tell me to buy something else. Just like the people who refuse to use Amsoil, all of these people are also misinformed. They all talk about how dangerous the car is in a crash, etc. You've heard it all.
Small Cars Have a Big Bumper Problem - Wheels Blog - NYTimes.com
When I compare the smart to all of these cars (equipped with automatics):
Chevy Aveo (Korean junk. Parts start to fade from the sun when the car ages. I'd be dieing to get rid of it in a few years from it being ugly.)
Hyundai Accent (Same.)
Toyota Yaris (I love the interior of the smart better)
Honda Civic (nice, but all of the Honda dealers charge above and beyond the MSRP)
Kia Rio (Not built to last. )
Mini Cooper (Everything is super expensive for this car. Even used ones are much more expensive than a brand new smart.)
And the thing is with those cars that have the 100,000 mile warranty... it only applies to the ENGINE and TRANSMISSION, of which usually NEVER fails within 100,000 miles. It's everything else like the A/C, power windows, faded interior, various switches inside the cab, etc. that all fail which are never included in that warranty. I would only consider one of the above cars if the prices stayed the same that they are now and they all had a zero-deductible, bumper-to-bumper 100,000 mile warranty.
The smart pluses for me:
- gets better gas mileage than all of them
- cheaper to fix in small fender benders
- fraction of the cost in oil and transmission fluid changes
- has a timing chain instead of a belt (big thumbs up here! It's nice to not have to pay a mechanic hundreds of dollars to open the engine up to change a timing belt.)
- plus the fact that I'd like a German car.
Every one of those cars will cost me a lot of money to service the transmission. The smart car is only 3.5 quarts of tranny fluid (gear lube) every 100,000 miles and that can be changed on my own. For all of the cars above, I have to buy a ton of fluid and then find a place that has a flushing machine. It's a real hassle. I can do all of the service on the smart myself without ever taking it to a shop or dealer. That's not so with all of the above cars. So the transmission will only cost me barely $40 bucks every 100,000 miles to service. THAT'S NOTHING compared to all of the multiple visits to a shop for a conventional automatic transmission.
I know this car has it's faults, but it will get you from A to B, reliably, comfortably and the cheapest way possible.
I can't wait to get one. Hopefully by early 2010... that's the target date for a 2010 model. I'm hoping for the MHD version if they bring it to the U.S.