Home News Models Alternatives
 
Smart Car of America - America's Largest Smart Fortwo Enthusiast Community   Smart Fortwo, smart car, smartcar
HOME FORUMS GALLERY

Go Back   Smart Car of America Forums > Smart Car Community > Smart Car General Discussion

Notices

» Supporting Partner
» Recent Threads
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-02-2007, 07:42 PM   #1 (permalink)
 
Walrus's Avatar
 
Location: New York State
Manual Transmission

Does anyone know why they dont offer the smart in a true manual transmission?

Walrus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2007, 10:28 PM   #2 (permalink)
 
propes's Avatar
 
Location: St. Paul MN
Drive: 2009 White/Silver fortwo!
The reason stated is because a true manual is a pain in the butt in a stop-and-go city environment. I couldn't say if it was true or not; I've always had an automatic.

propes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2007, 12:45 AM   #3 (permalink)
SCOA Club
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walrus View Post
Does anyone know why they dont offer the smart in a true manual transmission?
maybe:

1) too many americans no longer know how to shift a manual, and feared few would buy a car they could not shift.

2) on initial launch, too complicated/costly to offer two of something, if they can get by offering one.

when i first drove it, i thought it drove horrible, cause i thought it was a usa typical automatic trans.

when i found out, it has a clutch plate, and shifts and operates just like a standard manual, only an electric motor does your foot work, while the elcetric motor shifts the gears manually for you (ie, manual automatic),

it made a lot of sense, and i wished i could drive it again, to feel it go thru the gears, like i would if i was pushing the clutch in to shift gears. i wanted the manual, because its more mpg efficient than than a typical usa automatic with the same gear ratios.

when i found out, it is indeed what i wanted, my disappoint turned to joy, and curiosity returned to drive it new all over again.

this a a major consumer information point, that the company must clearly emphasize, and easily explain,

ie, that this is the fuel efficient manual clutch plate transmission, and the only difference from typical manual five speeds, is that they added an electric motor, to do your clutch foot pushing work for you.

that little bit of understanding, totally changed my perception of the whole vehicle. and i am a little familiar with engines, as i have re-built an entire engine (one).

for those less mechanically inclined, its even more important to make this easy point clear for anyone to understand.

its not a difficult marketing task. but it makes a huge difference in the cars perception by a potential buyer. it certain did for me.

mr_Cash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2007, 02:00 AM   #4 (permalink)
SCOA Club
 
Location: Mars
Quote:
Originally Posted by propes View Post
The reason stated is because a true manual is a pain in the butt in a stop-and-go city environment. I couldn't say if it was true or not; I've always had an automatic.
Most likely true.....since the car is being sold as an urban/city car, basically. Shifting gears would suck in the city. If they offered manual, I would buy it because I don't need to shift that much and enjoy more control that way.

SmartBob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2007, 02:10 AM   #5 (permalink)
SCOA Club
 
DaveInTexas's Avatar
 
Location: Allen, Texas Reservation #13
Drive: 2005 Mazdaspeed Miata
I don't think so. I think Americans have forgoten how to drive. I live in the Dallas metromess and drive a stick shift with no problems. Just watch a truck driver next time you are stuck in traffic. Most of the experienced ones know how to keep the truck moving without using the clutch too much.

DaveInTexas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2007, 05:49 AM   #6 (permalink)
Smart A**
SCOA Club
 
lhoboy's Avatar
 
Location: DC Area (Silver Spring)
Drive: '02 MCS JCW,'90 GMC 1500K
My SCOA Gallery
Close to 40 years and a million miles of driving, I've done most of it with manual transmissions and have hated every autiomatic I've ever driven (including the Smart). Most people I know, drive manual transmissions, but that's probably because most of them enjoy the thrill of driving and don't see it as a chore. I think the issue on the Smart is that Mercedes for decades has assessed the American market as hating the manual. In truth, I think they have lost sales of their sports models as a result of not offering manual transmissions. This philososophy, unfortunately, has carried over to the design of the Smart. Despite the fact that the MINI is targeted at Urban markets, a very small percentage of them are sold with automatics. It just takes the fun out of driving it. Our Smart is primarily intended for my wife's use, but even she is a bit wary of having a small car without a manual transmission. Just because you can't drink your coffee, chomp on your big mac, jaw on the phone and apply your eye liner while shifting, doesn't make a manual transmission the wrong choice for an urban commuter. If and when a full manual is available on the Smart, we will be trading in for one immediately.

lhoboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2007, 06:17 AM   #7 (permalink)
SCOA Club
 
Old smart's Avatar
 
Location: City of Williamsburg, VA
Drive: μ-BENZ
My take is a little different, and with a bit less motoring bravado.

First is a marketing decision: there is at least something for everyone in its dual-mode design without complicating the manufacturing and distributing process with multi transmission choices. I recall that in manual-centric Europe the dual-mode transmission was specified from the beginning.

Second is the possibility that the fuel tank, which is right under the shifter and cabin floor, would interfere with mechanical shifting linkages, either manual or automatic. An electric cable bundle is an easy do.

Separately, I think the paddle shifters in the passion and cabiró are absolutely superfluous, an unnecessary whiz-bang. Maybe OK for the Walter Mittys in pulses and Brabi, but I would do without them.

Old smart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2007, 07:53 AM   #8 (permalink)
 
kurt013's Avatar
 
Location: Indiana
Drive: Smart cabrio
It's not just an American thing, I don't think the Smart has ever had a true manual, even when it was exclusive to Europe. I'm quite concerned about the transmision, last time I had an automatic was a 1973 Vega, and that brings back memories I was hoping would stay suppressed forever. lhoby, I think you were right on.

Last edited by kurt013; 11-03-2007 at 07:55 AM.. Reason: addition

kurt013 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2007, 08:22 AM   #9 (permalink)
SCOA Club
 
Old smart's Avatar
 
Location: City of Williamsburg, VA
Drive: μ-BENZ
Quote:
Originally Posted by kurt013 View Post
I'm quite concerned about the transmision, last time I had an automatic was a 1973 Vega, and that brings back memories I was hoping would stay suppressed forever.
Remember that the smart transmission is NOT a torque converter (an "automatic"). And in concept it not much different than a Formula 1 transmission - gear teeth, electronic clutch, and all. No, you can't throw a heroic-sounding, double-clutch downshift, but neither can Kimi Raikkonen.

Old smart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2007, 02:34 PM   #10 (permalink)
Smart A**
SCOA Club
 
lhoboy's Avatar
 
Location: DC Area (Silver Spring)
Drive: '02 MCS JCW,'90 GMC 1500K
My SCOA Gallery
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishrdnc View Post
No, you can't throw a heroic-sounding, double-clutch downshift, but neither can Kimi Raikkonen.

You know, that may be the whole point. With any type of tranny, this thing is never going to have the term "performance" associated with it. At least with a manual and a bunch of over-revving and double-clutching, you might have made it sound impressive. ;)

lhoboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Today
 


This ad will not be shown if you are logged in.

Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Smart Car Owner's Manual lhoboy Smart Car Operation and Maintenance 16 09-25-2009 09:57 PM
Is there a problem with the Getrag Transmission? SMART Smart Car News & Rumors 56 08-01-2008 10:14 PM
Service Manual? MSOEMiller Smart Car General Discussion 5 06-21-2008 06:39 PM
U.S. Transmission ("Park") Old smart Smart Car General Discussion 52 02-14-2008 07:46 PM
Transmission question Tom Burns Smart Car General Discussion 6 07-25-2007 01:47 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:22 PM.


Smart Cars of America, LLC is not affiliated with, authorized by, associated with or have any connection with G&K, Zap, Mercedes-Benz, Mercedes-Benz AMG, Mercedes-Benz McLaren Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, smart Canada Division, DaimlerChrysler, Chrysler LLC, DaimlerChrysler AG, Maybach, smart gmbh, a division of Mercedes Benz LLC, the manufacturer of SMART automobiles, smart USA Distributor, LLC, a division of Penske Automotive Group, Inc, the exclusive authorized U.S. importer and distributor of the smart vehicle or any of their official dealerships


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Ad Management by RedTyger