Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rigger
Ummm...
Speaking as a concealed pistol license holder: Be very careful with that thought.
Most jurisdictions in the US won't look favorably on using deadly force to protect property; only to protect your life. Shooting someone over a cellphone is an invitation to a state-mandated "vacation" in one of those maximum-security "hotels." (I hear you probably won't like the food or the recreational activities...)
Of course, if someone jumped in your car and attacked you, then all bets are off.
|
Welcome to the "Gray Bar B & B", where your next meal will be just the same as your last, and you'll have a much bigger worry than a stolen cell phone!

Can you say "BUBBA?"

Seriously, though, even if they stole the entire car, you'd be better off providing a real good description to the police and filing a claim with your insurance company for the stolen vehicle. Even in states where the "Castle Doctrine" doesn't apply, it's just NOT worth having to spend thousands (or hundreds of thousands), and perhaps losing everything that you own, to defend yourself for shooting (or even threatening) someone over something like that. Better off just writing it off and locking the car from now on. Also, if you're seriously planning on someday getting a CCW, you probably want to "rethink" making "statements against interest" such as the title of this thread! :>( If you DO ever have to use a weapon, you DON'T want prosecutors talking to friends/neighbors/forum members, and being told "Yeh, he said the next person that ____________ was going to get SHOT!!" :>( NOT a smart statement from the defense attorney's point of view.