Pay it Forward_ K&N air filter - Page 2 - Smart Car of America Forums : Smart Car Forum
Home News Models Alternatives
 
Smart Car of America - America's Largest Smart Fortwo Enthusiast Community   Smart Fortwo, smart car, smartcar
HOME FORUMS GALLERY

Go Back   Smart Car of America Forums : Smart Car Forum > Community > smart General Discussion


Notices

SmartCarofAmerica.com is the premier Smart Car Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
» Auto Insurance
» Supporting Partner
» Recent Threads
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-08-2008, 03:12 PM   #11 (permalink)
 
SylenThunder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Northern Macomb County, MI
Drive: Passion
Posts: 353
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
I remember the old scare about the oil from the filter getting onto the intake flap and killing your engine. Everybody's got soemthing.

On a serious note, newer engines do not benefit as much from a K&N or similar filter. I did notice about a 2-4mpg linprovement in my Saturn Vue when switching to the K&N replacement filter, and about another 2mpg on top of that when I upgraded to a true K&N cold air intake. (Not the kit that they sell for an outrageous amount, I custom built the intake shaft and placed the air filter outside of the engine compartment, awesome results with that.) Would like to try it on the smart, but gonna wait until the actual filter is released. (Januaryish last I heard.) The biggest issue seems to be the little bitty intake pipe, but then engine is not all that large either.

SylenThunder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2008, 06:29 PM   #12 (permalink)
 
smarteepants's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: cedar city, ut. 84720
Drive: Cabrio
Posts: 86
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I use to put k&n on everthing from my personal vehicles to street bikes and atv's, and by itself, it just doesn't seem to do much except make it louder. I think most people think that just because it's louder, it must be faster. "NOT" the case with my experience, and I won't waste my money on them anymore.
smarteepants is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2008, 08:17 PM   #13 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Florence, Oregon
Drive: Passion
Posts: 4,885
Thanks: 0
Thanked 21 Times in 20 Posts
OMG...I can't believe the responses!!! Kudos for paying it forward mvaldes and jwight!! If you don't want the filters then don't bash the effort to make them available to other members who do!!
Dunerunner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2008, 10:24 PM   #14 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Canada
Drive: Passion
Posts: 548
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dunerunner View Post
OMG...I can't believe the responses!!! Kudos for paying it forward mvaldes and jwight!! If you don't want the filters then don't bash the effort to make them available to other members who do!!
There's no bashing here - what we have is information - you can accept it and use it to further your awareness of what these filters represent or simply ignore it - your choice. The filters will always be available if you want them.

By the way, Arlen Spicer did not conduct these series of tests! The tests were independently conducted on a purpose-built, $285,000 air filter testing machine at Testand Corp of Rhode Island. And contrary to what was posted, they were not debunked. K&N's testing was done 'in-house'.
If any "debunking" is being done it is to the claims of K&N in relation to use in road cars. I have noted that they have toned down their claims somewhat but still use misleading wording and controversial claims. They word their advertising and claims in such a way as to create an impression that readers could interpret as factual when K&N did not actually state it as fact. Their marketing has been very slik and that is why they have been successful in marketing to car enthusiasts who want to believe. For this reason consumers must be cautious and do a thorough investigation to know what they are really being offered. Caveat Emptor!
The following reference goes a long way to explain the "debunking" comments and Spicer's experiences with K&N. This requires a careful reading. http://www.dieselplace.com/forum/showthread.php?t=66536

The ISO standards that apply are ISO 5011:2000, 11841-1&2:2000, 12103-1&2:1997, and 19713-1&2. I don't know what stage these are currently in or what tests K&N referred to, probably the 5011. The standards are specific and don't support claims of greater horsepower or filtration ability that does not allow the passage of wear particles. ISO standards are only for repeatability and documentation - if a company is making a poor product (performance wise) it just has to continue making that poor product. They are also not comparable from one testing facility to another.

It's important that drivers understand what they are doing when replacing OEM components like air filters. These oiled gauze, and foam, filters were originally designed for use in off-road vehicles and for competition use. Oiled gauze filters are great in the right applications - road going vehicles is not one of them. In engines that were designed for their use or situations that can take advantage of their wet durability they can provide maximum output but your smart car was designed with the OEM paper filter in mind. Replacing that with a more porous gauze filter will most likely not net you any more power or economy, but it will certainly introduce more dirt into your engine depending on the ambient conditions you tend to drive in. Removing the filter altogether will not even produce more power. To see the effect from using these filters all you need to do is to run with a K&N (or equivalent) filter for a period of time then examine your intake tract. You will find a layer of fine dirt. Also, get an oil analysis and you will see an increased percentage of silicone (dirt) over the times when the OEM filter is being used.

You might also be be aware that these porous gauze filters may flow more air when new and clean but they load up faster than the OEM paper filters and their advantage suffers as indicated in the testing. Note the quote - "...These filters (K&N) had a lower initial restriction, but they became exponentially more restrictive under a constant flow of dirt". Note this quote as well - "Compared to the AC, the K&N “plugged up” nearly 3 times faster, passed 18 times more dirt and captured 37% less dirt."

I've used K&N filters in the past by the way, but they were used for competition and off road. They are also well made and durable. That does not mean that I would use them in my road cars.
There is much more that can be said but I won't bother here. This has all been rehashed over and over again on other car and motorcycle forums. Perhaps smart car owners only have to live through the experience.
fortow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2008, 11:27 PM   #15 (permalink)
SCOA Club
 
DavidV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Menlo Park, CA
Drive: Cabrio
Posts: 238
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by fortow View Post
There's no bashing here - what we have is information - you can accept it and use it to further your awareness of what these filters represent or simply ignore it - your choice. The filters will always be available if you want them.

By the way, Arlen Spicer did not conduct these series of tests! The tests were independently conducted on a purpose-built, $285,000 air filter testing machine at Testand Corp of Rhode Island. And contrary to what was posted, they were not debunked. K&N's testing was done 'in-house'.
If any "debunking" is being done it is to the claims of K&N in relation to use in road cars. I have noted that they have toned down their claims somewhat but still use misleading wording and controversial claims. They word their advertising and claims in such a way as to create an impression that readers could interpret as factual when K&N did not actually state it as fact. Their marketing has been very slik and that is why they have been successful in marketing to car enthusiasts who want to believe. For this reason consumers must be cautious and do a thorough investigation to know what they are really being offered. Caveat Emptor!
I'll disclose here as I have elsewhere on this board that I was the Brand Marketing Director at K&N for a number of years, including when Arlen Spicer returned to K&N in an attempt to recreate his Testand findings.

I'm not going to go into a lot of finger pointing, but suffice it to say, that test was conclusively proven as flawed in both its methodology and the spin that was put on it in the write-up linked earlier.

K&N Air Filter Efficiency Testing

K&N Air Filter Efficiency Testing

If it really was "sand paper" to the engine, would Carl Judice have been able to squeeze a million miles out of his stock Silverado?

I drove a million miles on one K&N Air Filter!

If it loaded up faster than paper and restricted flow when dirty, why wouldn't Baja racers all use paper? (it doesn't - it is depth loading unlike paper which surface loads)

Heck, how could you get a bunch of Land Rovers around the world without a single filter change?

K&N Filters: Around The World



-- DavidV

Last edited by DavidV; 10-08-2008 at 11:30 PM.
DavidV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2008, 11:40 PM   #16 (permalink)
 
Quagmire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Quohog
Posts: 106
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Anyone remember Slick 50?
Quagmire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2008, 05:45 AM   #17 (permalink)
SCOA Club
 
mvaldes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: maplewood, nj
Drive: Passion
Posts: 2,588
Thanks: 20
Thanked 52 Times in 45 Posts
Garage
My K&N filter has been spoken for and will go in the mail today or tomorrow. Thanks for all the interest and the interesting commentary.
mvaldes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2008, 06:38 AM   #18 (permalink)
 
MPrice2984's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NW Indiana - Westville/MC
Drive: Passion
Posts: 482
Thanks: 16
Thanked 45 Times in 26 Posts
I've had the K&N in my car for about 4k miles. It hasn't resulted in any noticeable improvement in performance or mileage. I wouldn't use an oiled filter if I didn't do all my driving on the freeway in a clean air environment. However I do think those who are in to conservation can justify it as you clean it and reinstall, never having to put another replaceable paper filter in a garbage dump.
MPrice2984 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2008, 08:17 AM   #19 (permalink)
SCOA Club
 
DavidV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Menlo Park, CA
Drive: Cabrio
Posts: 238
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by MPrice2984 View Post
I've had the K&N in my car for about 4k miles. It hasn't resulted in any noticeable improvement in performance or mileage. I wouldn't use an oiled filter if I didn't do all my driving on the freeway in a clean air environment. However I do think those who are in to conservation can justify it as you clean it and reinstall, never having to put another replaceable paper filter in a garbage dump.
Actually, K&N's do better than paper off road than paper by a long shot - hence their popularity in Baja, WRC, Dirt Track, and similar environments.

Good point re: waste... especially considering that 100 million conventional filters end up in U.S. landfills each year. Not to mention the associated waste in manufacturing, transport, packaging, etc.

-- DavidV
DavidV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2008, 08:19 AM   #20 (permalink)
SCOA Club
 
DavidV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Menlo Park, CA
Drive: Cabrio
Posts: 238
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quagmire View Post
Anyone remember Slick 50?
What about it?

-- DavidV
DavidV is offline   Reply With Quote
Today
 


This ad will not be shown if you are logged in.

Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
K&N air filter ASmartMan Dealers and Parts 10 10-08-2009 07:38 AM
$22.00 For An Oil Filter UR2SLOW1 smart Operation and Maintenance 13 04-19-2008 03:01 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:52 PM.



Smart Cars of America, LLC is not affiliated with, authorized by, associated with or have any connection with G&K, Zap, Mercedes-Benz, Mercedes-Benz AMG, Mercedes-Benz McLaren Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, smart Canada Division, DaimlerChrysler, Chrysler LLC, DaimlerChrysler AG, Maybach, smart gmbh, a division of Mercedes Benz LLC, the manufacturer of SMART automobiles, smart USA Distributor, LLC, a division of Penske Automotive Group, Inc, the exclusive authorized U.S. importer and distributor of the smart vehicle or any of their official dealerships


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.
Ad Management by RedTyger