Is it safe?...the definitive answer! - Page 2 - Smart Car of America Forums : Smart Car Forum
Home News Models Alternatives
 
Smart Car of America - America's Largest Smart Fortwo Enthusiast Community   Smart Fortwo, smart car, smartcar
HOME FORUMS GALLERY

Go Back   Smart Car of America Forums : Smart Car Forum > Community > smart General Discussion


Notices

SmartCarofAmerica.com is the premier Smart Car Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
» Auto Insurance
» Supporting Partner
» Recent Threads
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-06-2009, 02:57 AM   #11 (permalink)
Admin/Mod.
SCOA Club
 
JPaul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Washington, DC
Drive: Passion
Posts: 7,424
Thanks: 74
Thanked 279 Times in 188 Posts
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Marshall View Post
A friend of mine who's been driving a Mini cooper for 5 years told me that he would never buy a smart because it doesn't look safe. I can't wait to drop this information on him.
To your friend's credit, he said that "it doesn't look safe."...

JPaul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2009, 05:28 AM   #12 (permalink)
 
Macaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Newman, Il
Drive: Pure
Posts: 524
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCC1701 View Post
Macaw, please cite your source. Link please.
The source is the IIHS I thought that was clear IIHS crash test results
Macaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2009, 05:49 AM   #13 (permalink)
 
pdboilermaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Frankfort, Indiana
Drive: Passion
Posts: 786
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
My favorite in good old Indiana is fielding this question from Harley riders not wearing helments
pdboilermaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2009, 06:12 AM   #14 (permalink)
Closed
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Gone my own way
Drive: Crossblade
Posts: 3,835
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 15 Posts
My smart center sent me a pack of 3-1/2" x 5-1/2" Q&A info cards to carry in the car that answer all the common questions. I think they are produced by smartUSA for each smart center (the last question is "> Where is my local dealer?" followed by the answer). The cards cover who makes it; the price; the engine; milege; how fast it goes; dimensions and space; safety; and how to get one.

It is easier to hand an inquisitor one of the cards than to stand there wasting time and breath with would-be comedians. People's reactions to the cards and then the car itself have been quite positive. No one has handed the card back.
Old smart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2009, 08:13 AM   #15 (permalink)
SCOA Club
 
forestacademy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Spry Whimsy Fiber Arts
Drive: Passion
Posts: 11,131
Thanks: 56
Thanked 312 Times in 220 Posts
Garage
Hmmm
"These dummies are positioned in the driver seat and the rear seat behind the driver."

I wonder if they take an acululation of the injuries to determine its raitings. Since the smart will only have one pasenger that is in this test I wonder if that sques the results.
If the rear pasenger/Kid gets hur in the others cars their raitings would fall, can't happen in a smart.
forestacademy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2009, 09:10 AM   #16 (permalink)
 
Macaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Newman, Il
Drive: Pure
Posts: 524
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
They do break out the data (but I'll leave that for someone else to chart).... but just a random sampling looks like the driver fairs worse than the passenger
Macaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 09:01 AM   #17 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New England
Drive: Pure
Posts: 572
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPaul View Post
To your friend's credit, he said that "it doesn't look safe."...
Remember he drives a MINI. Does that car look safe? Coming from a the driver of a MINI Cooper, that comment seemed incongruous . . . or at least ironic.
Bill Marshall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 07:16 PM   #18 (permalink)
 
Fredvon4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Lampasas, Texas
Drive: Passion
Posts: 1,860
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
big whoop....yawn! (if one could yawn enthusiastically).......grin

the OP fails to cite empirical evidence and overstates the micro car rating...

the cited ratings are not rational considering many of the cars in this list provided that I have owned

Like magazine comparisons...many of the studies and ratings are seriously suspect of graft and corruption..... sort of like Obama promise of change... nothing changes but the depth of the lie

this is NOT a Mercedes, and has Zero Mercedes craftsmanship applied..IMO

I say this as a owner of several older Mercedes products....

I like my Smart cars for what they are....BUT!!! superior craftsmanship is seriously lacking...fact

Sorry, I own three of the Lil buggers now, and none the less they are NOT an inherently safe vehicle relative to a 7800 pound F-350 or any similarly large vehicle..... period

Let the " but it ain't safe" folks have their say... and acknowledge that we who own the dinky micro car are required to drive defensively or die... fact....

I am aware that this is sacrilege, but i really get tired of the "smart car" as religion crowd

this site has indeed become exceptionally stale

Bottom line

Drive defensively and with 100% full attention to DRIVING in ANY car, and do Not let some BS study lull you into a false belief that you are safe and secure in this particular micro car

Yes! Relative to a 1974 VW beetle bug this is a safer car..... relative to a 5400 pound 70 mph mid sized car you are going to loose and loose big.... drive accordingly....wink
Fredvon4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2009, 08:10 PM   #19 (permalink)
 
Macaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Newman, Il
Drive: Pure
Posts: 524
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fredvon4 View Post
big whoop....yawn! (if one could yawn enthusiastically).......grin

the OP fails to cite empirical evidence and overstates the micro car rating...

the cited ratings are not rational considering many of the cars in this list provided that I have owned

Like magazine comparisons...many of the studies and ratings are seriously suspect of graft and corruption..... sort of like Obama promise of change... nothing changes but the depth of the lie
So in side impact which is the ONLY test that can be compared across all vehicles and the smart gets the highest rating over larger vehicle is over stating the smart how? In a side impact the smart IS safer than the lower rated vehicles or do you have some other RATIONAL explanation on why they did worse? ALL vehicles tested were hit in the side with the exact same 3300lbs test sled traveling at 31mph. I doubt very much that smart has the moolah to pay off the IIHS to get a good rating! The only conspiracy here is that mercedes did their homework very well and designed a safe small car. Just my own personal observation but in town the most comon accident I see is getting t-boned in an intersection so the side impact rating is important to me. And don't be lulled into a FALSE sense of safety in a poorly designed LARGE vehicle either.
If you feel safer driving a large vehicle with a P rating over a G (side impact) go right ahead because if you get hit in the side you're gonna be in a world of hurt. Front impact or rear size does matter in the side it's how well you are designed!
Macaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009, 07:25 PM   #20 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: San Diego
Drive: Passion
Posts: 258
Thanks: 1
Thanked 58 Times in 29 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Marshall View Post
Remember he drives a MINI. Does that car look safe? Coming from a the driver of a MINI Cooper, that comment seemed incongruous . . . or at least ironic.
Have you looked at the doors of a Mini vs the doors of a Smart? The Mini doors are over twice as thick as our Smart's. There is a lot more car there in the Mini vs the Smart, but this Mini owner's reaction is strange considering how the Mini was received and viewed when it was first released. But like the Mini, the Smart's construction BEHIND the skin of those doors is very safety-minded and engineered quite well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fredvon4 View Post
the OP fails to cite empirical evidence and overstates the micro car rating...

the cited ratings are not rational considering many of the cars in this list provided that I have owned

Like magazine comparisons...many of the studies and ratings are seriously suspect of graft and corruption..... sort of like Obama promise of change... nothing changes but the depth of the lie

this is NOT a Mercedes, and has Zero Mercedes craftsmanship applied..IMO

I say this as a owner of several older Mercedes products....

I like my Smart cars for what they are....BUT!!! superior craftsmanship is seriously lacking...fact

Sorry, I own three of the Lil buggers now, and none the less they are NOT an inherently safe vehicle relative to a 7800 pound F-350 or any similarly large vehicle..... period

Let the " but it ain't safe" folks have their say... and acknowledge that we who own the dinky micro car are required to drive defensively or die... fact....

I am aware that this is sacrilege, but i really get tired of the "smart car" as religion crowd

this site has indeed become exceptionally stale

Bottom line

Drive defensively and with 100% full attention to DRIVING in ANY car, and do Not let some BS study lull you into a false belief that you are safe and secure in this particular micro car
You post is full of all sorts of fail I don't even know where to begin. Facts and sources were stated, not over stated. The majority of the first part of your post seems to be trying to say that the OP and the safety board are part of some big conspiracy to dupe the public. Source? All you did was state that quoted report data was not rational due to the fact that you owned many of the cars on the list that were rated lower than the Smart. Just how many cars built since 2008 (the oldest build date of any model on that list) have YOU actually owned? Prior models were NOT tested. This was data ONLY on the newer ones and I see no evidence proving that every new vehicle is ALWAYS safer than the old. But regardless of that, had you owned those vehicle what does that prove about how they stand up to a side impact from a 3300 lbs object? Did you design them? Have you been involved in a side impact collision with ANY of them by a 3300 lbs vehicle? These are NOT rhetorical questions, please answer them.

Me? I've been involved in several accidents in a wide variety of vehicles (all but one I was a passenger so no comments about my driving from the peanut gallery, please ) including one where the car hit a palm tree with the door I was sitting next to. I am here able to post on teh intarwebs because of the side impact safety features (namely steel reinforcement bars) that most well built cars have. Those cars do very well on the side impact test that was cited by the OP. And guess what, the Smart has at least two of these bars. How many does a Crown Vic have? What about a Focus? The Yaris (which wasn't even listed on that data but I know from personal research did NOT do well unless you optioned the side air bags)? I'm pretty sure these safety features, as well as the traction control and other electronic aids are part of the Mercedes craftsmanship that you seem to think is lacking in the car. A Mercedes isn't defined purely by the smell of the leather or the quality of the stitching for the seats. There is so much more to a car than what most people see that the majority of the owners never even realize what level of craftsmanship and engineering really HAS gone into the vehicles.

Yes, there are people that may be carrying on a bit much about the "Smart Religion" as you put it. But unless you have any real facts to throw into the conversation proving a point as wrong, please just be quiet.

And I do agree with your bottom line that EVERY driver has to drive defensively and not get complacent about what happens out on the road. But we all know that there are still things outside of our control in this world and I for one feel better knowing that the car I'm in will be able to protect me better than everything else on that list SHOULD I be involved in that type of side impact accident. I'm not looking for it to happen, but I am better protect in case it does. Owners of those Jeeps and Titans can't say that, stock for stock.
uberpanzer is offline   Reply With Quote
Today
 


This ad will not be shown if you are logged in.

Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Definitive Jacking Points redbluff smart Operation and Maintenance 15 06-06-2008 12:48 PM
Need a quick answer... Eric H. smart General Discussion 8 05-09-2008 02:12 PM
No One Can Answer This Question Smartarse smart General Discussion 3 04-04-2008 08:16 PM
Insurance - don't take no for an answer! MarieGotSmart smart General Discussion 2 03-04-2008 02:12 PM
Do you know the answer to this? pagja smart General Discussion 15 09-27-2007 06:11 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:23 PM.



Smart Cars of America, LLC is not affiliated with, authorized by, associated with or have any connection with G&K, Zap, Mercedes-Benz, Mercedes-Benz AMG, Mercedes-Benz McLaren Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, smart Canada Division, DaimlerChrysler, Chrysler LLC, DaimlerChrysler AG, Maybach, smart gmbh, a division of Mercedes Benz LLC, the manufacturer of SMART automobiles, smart USA Distributor, LLC, a division of Penske Automotive Group, Inc, the exclusive authorized U.S. importer and distributor of the smart vehicle or any of their official dealerships


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.
Ad Management by RedTyger