Quote:
Originally Posted by EdwardDennis
...
Smart needs a US-spec roadster and forfour model to remain competitive-- hawking a 10 year-old fortwo platform won't cut it.
My humble opinion, of course...
|
Your opinion is not so humble - in my opinion, of course.
If this car is to maintain viability and rise beyond a tiny niche market it will have to change - and the changes will have to make it perform more like every other car in the market with drivability similar to what people are accustomed to - and with excellent reliability, no more odd electrical gremlins.
The competition is too well financed, too well engineered, too well known and respected, and with too large a dealer network however.
The smart concept was interesting and good and in the right market an exceptional car. In North America it is the answer to a question that hasn't really been asked. I still like it since there wasn't anything else available that had the same combination of qualities that served my purposes. That will be changing in the next few year though.
Once these cars come off warranty, and owners have to foot the costly bills for maintenance and repair and all the adjustments that seem to be required, then a different tune will be expressed by owners in general. Service is far too expensive and associated with other problems as have been continually discussed on these forums. Unless these cars start selling in greater numbers or dealership policies change then that doesn't bode well either.
Hopefully, those in a position to make favourable changes are favourable to maintaining the viability of this brand. I have always backed underdogs, and recognize that is is only through their contributions that positive things really do happen.