After some more digging, I found specific information relating to the steering ratio of the smart's manual and electric power steering systems.
The manual system has a ratio of 22:1 (meaning one degree of rotation at the front wheels requires 22 degrees rotation of the steering wheel). The EPS system has a ratio of 21:1. So technically it is quicker, but by a very small margin.
Here are the theoretical steering inputs (
i.e. steering wheel rotation) required to execute a 30 ft radius turn in each case, with the MINI Cooper thrown in for comparison:
Car......................................Wheelbase .......Ratio.......Steering Input
smart with manual steering...........73.5 in..........22.0:1........254 degrees
smart with EPS...........................73.5 in..........21.0:1........242 degrees
MINI Cooper...............................97.1 in..........13.2:1........199 degrees
This is a crude comparison that does not account for speed, steering geometry or tire slip angles, but it gives a clue as to why the MINI feels more agile.
I think the real world difference between smarts with and without EPS on the same tires will be minimal. I also suspect that the improved agility noted by some jounalists for smarts fitted with EPS may have more to do with bigger tires and reduced slip angles than the steering system itself.
The article referencing the steering ratio information can be found here (it contains some other interesting technical info too):
http://www.duemotori.com/news/auto_n...riving_fun.php