» Site Navigation |
|
Helpful Links
smart USA Newsletters
Other Links
|
» Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Supporting Vendor Directory |
|
|
|
 |
|
03-07-2008, 07:38 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Administrator
|
Did you just give it your best shot or was there a generic kit that worked?
|
|
|
03-08-2008, 10:18 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
|
But the manual says no load on the roof......
From page 301 of the manual:
Weights: Roof Load - NONE
"This vehicle is not intended to carry items on its roof. Thus roof rails and any roofmounted devices must not be used."
I really like the look of this Yakima set-up & I've used their roof racks for bikes, etc. on previous vehicles but always where the manufacturer has listed a roof rating. Does anyone know if there is a structural reason for having a zero load rating for the roof or is it simply they could not envision a workable arrangement? Has anyone asked smartusa?
|
|
|
03-08-2008, 10:38 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmwery
Does anyone know if there is a structural reason for having a zero load rating for the roof or is it simply they could not envision a workable arrangement? Has anyone asked smartusa?
|
Perhaps because of how narrow/tall it is? Throws off the balance too much (danger of tip over  )?
If it were because of the polycarbonate roof I'd think the manual would state that considering that the Pures don't have it..
|
|
|
03-08-2008, 11:22 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Location: City of Williamsburg, VA
Drive: fortwo premium coupé
|
Crosswinds
Some years back I routinely carried four bikes and six wheels on a LaPrealpina rack, mounted on a Peugeot 505 STI (a pretty heavy car with big meaty tires). Crosswinds would have it all over the road.
|
|
|
03-08-2008, 12:02 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
|
The rack is not mounted on the roof; it's on the tridion cage. I doubt that the rack will in some way weaken the tridion (it's not drilled). The Pure has an opaque plastic roof, also without load bearing capacity.
Clearly carrying a bike or even skis or snowboards will make any vehicle more susceptible to crosswinds, and also make it less fuel efficient due to increased wind drag. The rack itself has pretty low drag (having done the experiment on several cars, you lose very little fuel efficiency - it's almost undetectable).
On the other hand, I am not planning to put a box on top of the car, nor am I planning to carry much more than 50 lbs up there (two bikes, for example). In any case, wind drag is clearly a much bigger deal than the weight, but the clips fit really well, and the rack is very solid.
Having said all that, this car weighs 1800 lbs, more than an original VW beetle or squareback, and probably close to the weight of a classic microbus. I have driven lighter cars (our old squareback was under 1600#) with considerably 'looser' steering in high winds with both bikes and skis on top, and never had a problem. The microbus, on the other hand, was terrifying on a two lane highway with any significant crosswind (without any kind of roofrack). I doubt that with a bike, or two pairs of skis, there will be too much of an increase in susceptibility to crosswinds over the vehicle without a rack. But this forum will be the first to hear about it.
Oliver
|
|
|
03-08-2008, 12:10 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Location: Bloomfield Hills, MI
|
Usually roof means the roof panel (polycarbonate panel). There are no 'roof bows' supporting the middle of the polycarbonate panel only the front and rear header.
The location of the Yakima Rack appears it is being support on the aperture (side of car) of the Tridion cell.
At my local smart center, on display is a body-in-white, the skeletal metal structure, of the smart fortwo. From what Oliver in Seattle did it appears the rack will work with the Tridion cell.
His solution looks like the direction I want to follow. I have a triathlon bike and a tandem bike that I would like to carry. Since my tandem bike is 8 foot long the roof idea appears to be an ideal solution. I will be removing the front wheel so it fits better on the roof rack.
Last edited by Bob_Parr; 03-08-2008 at 07:32 PM..
|
|
|
03-08-2008, 02:49 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Location: Twin Cities, MN
|
While in France in 2000 at the same time the Tour 'd France race was in full gear (pun intended ;)), I saw numerous smarts with racked bikes. In one instance, I counted 6 bikes on the roof with another 6 mounted on a trailer behind! They were typically stuffing bikes in wherever and however they could be fit (the large racing teams had numerous bikes for each rider and many riders to outfit using multiples of vehicles).
I also saw a couple smarts at rental stores outfitted with multi-purpose racks for carrying skis and/or surf boards.
While it may state in the manual that there is a zero weight rating for the roof, my thought is that it refers to the ROOF (panel or, heaven forbid, the cabrio 'roof'). They don't want someone attempting to strap a sheet of plywood directly on the roof - if something were to break, I'm sure it would fall out of the warranty if caused by weight on an unsupported roof panel. On the other hand, the tridion frame seems able to carry a basic rack good enough for a couple bikes, skis, snowboards, etc.
The install you've done looks nice. I would say try it and give us some updates - and a couple images with bikes/skis loaded!
- FRED "2 MUTCH"
Is it a car? Is it a mind set? It's BOTH!
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|