Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Marshall
You can speculate about the reasons, but I can just as easily guess that it was to maximize mpg while still providing adequate support for the rear. I can also guess that it had to do with weight distribution since most of the weight in this car is in the rear...
|
Bill, staggered wheel/tire widths are not unique to the smart. Most (if not all) of MB's and BMW's 'sport' package and performance models have wider rears to induce understeer for 'sporting' drivers not experienced at driving on the limit of adhesion. This on cars that (especially in the case of BMW models) have nearly 50/50 weight distribution.
(Inducing understeer is also why factory recommended tire pressures are lower for front tires on RWD cars, whether staggered or not. FWD cars typically have ~60% of the weight in front, therefore understeer is a given.)
Even without sporting pretentions, with such a short wheelbase and rear weight bias, everything possible is done on the smart to reduce the chance of oversteer. Otherwise the smart would have four narrow 'front' wheels/tires for optimal fuel economy.
As somebody else mentioned, along with the wider rear wheels/tires and higher rear pressures, severe negative camber for the rear wheels on the smart also increases rear grip in order to further induce understeer.
Unfortunately, chances are slim that you will find a salesman, dealer tech, or customer service rep well versed in vehicle dynamics to confirm this, but it is common knowledge among car tuners, racers, etc.