The SMART CAR OF AMERICA community is a social utility that connects you with fellow smart enthusiasts.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Take $400 in hardware store materials, one 1992 Honda Civic, and one focused DIYer who doesn't mind being stared at, and you get the AeroCivic with 95 mpg (at 65 mph) and 0.17 Cd:
I seem to remember Car & Driver doing a project like this (different car) during the early 70s fuel crisis. They got some good results also just by cleaning up the car's drag, although I don't think they went as far as the "boat tail."
I seem to remember Car & Driver doing a project like this (different car) during the early 70s fuel crisis. They got some good results also just by cleaning up the car's drag, although I don't think they went as far as the "boat tail."
Yup, but I don't think it did anything about the explosive nature of the Pinto's character.
Since it was a 15 year old car with over 350,000 miles (563,270 km) on the odometer at the time that I started this project, I had no concerns with resale values.
I have seen some thing similar done to the GM Impact - their electric vehicle that they later got rid of. It too had a 'boat tail'. It was used to see how fast it could go. It was run on a race track. It went very fast because it was more 'aerodynamiclly' clean.
Take $400 in hardware store materials, one 1992 Honda Civic, and one focused DIYer who doesn't mind being stared at, and you get the AeroCivic with 95 mpg (at 65 mph) and 0.17 Cd: