The Smart ForTwo is a long-awaited minicar that's been buzzing around European streets since 1998, where its diminutive size,
small-displacement engines, and distinct design have given it unique appeal. With elevated gasoline prices in the United States, the arrival of the second-generation Smart car is well
timed, and initial sales have exceeded company expectations.
Made in France by a subsidiary of Mercedes-Benz, the new Smart ForTwo arrived Stateside in spring 2008.
We're testing a model called the "Passion Coupe," a two-seater powered by a 71-hp, 1.0-liter three-cylinder engine coupled
to an automated manual transmission. The price came to $15,355 including shipping.
Initial impressions. Measuring 40 inches shorter than a Mini Cooper, the Smart ForTwo combines flashy styling and clever packaging, though it
disappoints with dynamics and overall value.
Despite
its tiny size, the high seating position makes you feel you're sitting
in a small SUV. Generous glass, including a see-through roof, gives
good visibility and a light, airy feel to the interior.
The cabin is
narrow, though, so having two people aboard makes for an intimate
driving experience, although the seats themselves are comfortable. A
very small turning circle makes it possible to pull a U-turn in your
driveway.
A
car like this should be fun and zippy. Sadly, the Smart is neither. The
ride is harsh, and broken urban pavement, this car's natural habitat,
pummels occupants mercilessly. The transmission shifts strangely, with
pauses and heaves between gears. Handling is not so responsive, and it
takes a lot of wheel winding to coax the Smart through corners. The
slow, noisy engine makes it necessary to plan ahead when merging into
traffic, although once on the highway it can keep up the pace.
Fuel consumption is a high point. So far we've been averaging 38 mpg. The EPA rates this Smart at 33 in the city, 41 on the
highway. However, the economy Smart requires premium fuel.
Crash test results
are quite sound. The Smart scored a Good in the Insurance Institute for
Highway Safety's frontal offset and demanding side-impact crash tests.
However, the front test is based on colliding into a car of the same
size. That means "Good" if you crash into another Smart. A giant SUV
might be another story.
CR's take:
Despite its many quirks, the Smart can be rather endearing. But from a
strictly practical standpoint, the Smart ForTwo is not so smart.
Premium fuel eats up a good part of the savings from its excellent fuel
economy. The car seats only two and provides modest cargo space.
Although it won't gather a crowd of gawkers, we think a far smarter
choice is the Honda Fit (due to be redesigned for 2009). The current Fit costs about the same amount, gets 32 mpg (34 with a stick shift), and has
none of the Smart's drawbacks.
The Dallas Morning News reporter Terry Box’s report tells us the Smart car is entertaining but lack some needed power?
Smart Car Logic CR 
We all agree the Smart Car is a crowd pleaser, and a true head turner. Nevertheless, Consumer Reports magazine expresses a different viewpoint. With issues like premium fuel, limited seating for two, humble cargo space and the premium prices charged, makes them ask! Is Smart really that Smart?
