The original warranty should cover the Control Unit. However, MB is alleging that since the vehicle missed the 10k service that the battery warranty is nullified because of “neglect”.
Now, it would be on MB to prove that:
1) The car wasn’t maintained.
2) The failure involved would have been prevented had the 10k maintenance been performed. Which, considering the car passed the 20k maintenance with flying colours, would be hard to prove.
This sounds like one of those scummy cases of something like a dealer denying warranty on a failed ecu because the driver didn’t do an oil change.
Now, it would be on MB to prove that:
1) The car wasn’t maintained.
2) The failure involved would have been prevented had the 10k maintenance been performed. Which, considering the car passed the 20k maintenance with flying colours, would be hard to prove.
This sounds like one of those scummy cases of something like a dealer denying warranty on a failed ecu because the driver didn’t do an oil change.