Smart Car of America Forum banner

21 - 24 of 24 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,790 Posts
Agreed...the lack of a significant crumple zone is the "wild card" to Smart's safety quotient!
Doesn't smart state that it activates the other car's crumple zone.
The moving barrier did not give at all!
The door is still closed too.

For what it's worth this improves the smart's chances on the road.
Perhaps not significant, yet everything helps.
 

·
Moderator
Joined
·
17,301 Posts
The smart didn't look good from the top view of the video, to me.:crying:

Did they mention the results of that test?
It was hit by a 5,500lb sled at 56 mph at a 20% offset and 7 degree angle. That's give or take the size of of a large-ish crossover hitting you while you're attempting to make a turn.

Unfortunately, it appears the results of their fleet study isn't available to the public eye...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
49 Posts
Doesn't smart state that it activates the other car's crumple zone.
The moving barrier did not give at all!
I don't think thats a fair or valid comparison. What if every car on the road was a smart car? There would be nothing to "activate." I think a better term would be that its crash ratings are "taking advantage" of another car's crumple zone. IMO they should all be tested via a brick wall. Why not plan for worst-case-scenario instead of "smart car crashing into full sized sedan safety rating"
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,944 Posts
The Fit was a tough call -- buy the 2013, which was made in Japan, or go for the new one that ostensibly have a better offset crash rating, but made in Mexico... I got the 2013 (and a big discount as well).
 
21 - 24 of 24 Posts
Top