Smart Car of America Forum banner
1 - 20 of 32 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
13 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 · (Edited)
Hello,

I have a gash in the tire sidewall, so now I'm changing the front two tires. At the front I currently have 165/60-15 Conti ProContacts.

A few months ago, I changed my rear tires to: 185/55-15s with General AltiMAX RT43 (thanks to @mattwithcats advice).
I have been really pleased with the ride and handling, esp thru winter in NY.

The wheels are "style" package stock sizes, so they are the 3-spoke alloys, and I don't plan on changing the front wheels to all same size as many have done.

What brand and size would anyone recommend for the front tires? I would think that a higher sidewall ratio like a 60 would be better for the bumpy city streets.
I've read that 175/55-15 is the max size on the front tires with stock rims.

Thanks in advance!
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,460 Posts
I had a 60 sidewall when originally bought. Not sure why, but feels smoother with the current 175/55's. have really rough roads here.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
175/55 and 195/50 are the tires that came originally with those wheels. As a crap shot I got one of the optional wheels hoping they would come with 175/55 up front, but came with 165/60 instead.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
13 Posts
Discussion Starter · #17 ·
165 is a slightly taller tire so will be safer bet for traction control compatibility. I wouldn't risk the shorter 175s.
Do you think I could go from 165/60-15 to 165/65-15 at front? Tirecalculator says that the diameter is 22.8" and 23.4", respectively, with a +2.6%, and I get the slightly higher sidewall for better ride. I wonder though if you would get more traction from the 175s, and hence a smoother ride. The style rims are 5" wide at the front.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,460 Posts
What I look at are the three sets that do happen to come with the car, and try to keep the revolutions per mile within the differences. So I looked at the 165/65-15 with the 185/55-15 and is seems more than the highest of the three, which is a red flag for me. 175/60-15 seems closer. Will look a little more.... (My son wants the iPad I'm using...)
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,460 Posts
155/60R15 and 175/55R15 -10.18 Revs per mile
165/60R15 and 195/50R15 +4.6 Revs per mile
175/55R15 and 195/50R15 -3.89 Revs per mile

165/60R15 and 185/55R15 -8.32 Revs per mile (Good)
165/65R15 and 185/55R15 +16.18 Revs per mile (Out) above +4.6


There is only one 165/65R15 tire listed on TireRack! Your options are limited.

Very few 175/60R15 tire choices on TireRack

175/60R15 and 185/55R15 +9.71 (Still out), but closer to +4.6 than +16.18

Both 165/65R15 and 175/60R15 should fit 5" wheels I believe. I checked. (The 185/55R15 is meant for minimum 5.5" wide wheel. I am sorry I made the suggestion as that is not meant to fit the 5" wide wheels that you have. For some reason my memory was thinking the front were 5.5" wide...)

My mother's C350 has a staggered tire setup. It came from Mercedes that way. The rear tires were shot before 30k miles. The rear brake pads were also worn really early. I believe this is due to the rear tires being shorter than the front. Traction control "thinks" the rear wheels are spinning relative to the front and applies the rear brakes to compensate.... Front tire tread depth and pads still good...
 

· Registered
Joined
·
159 Posts
We recently replaced the stock sized Conti tires on our 2010 Passion (175/55R15 rear and 155/60R15 front) with the same size Kumho Solus Kh16 tires ordered through Wal-Mart and the car rides much better than before. It's smoother/less harsh and seems a bit quieter. It also gets around better in snow than it did with the Conti tires. Just info to consider.
 
1 - 20 of 32 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top